Chandra’s counsel sought more time, to which Sebi’s counsel objected. Chandra’s legal team requested a later date from the tribunal, but Sebi’s counsel asked the bench to consider this as the final extension, citing developments and allegations made by Chandra in the public domain.
The matter may now be heard later in the month.
On Monday, Chandra criticised Sebi chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch and accused Sebi of corruption. The 73-year-old media baron called for further investigation and analysis. He alleged that one Manjit Singh, recommended to him by a bank chairperson, approached him in February to resolve all pending issues at Sebi for a “price”.
In an August 2023 order, Sebi had barred Chandra and his son Punit Goenka from holding key positions in four group firms. In June 2023, Sebi had alleged fraudulent practices and fund diversion by promoters from Shirpur Gold Refinery, an Essel Group firm.
The father-son duo had filed separate appeals seeking relief from the SAT.
Earlier in June, the Bombay High Court had directed Chandra to furnish the documents and information sought by the market regulator and to respond to the summons issued in the alleged fund diversion case. Chandra had filed a plea in the High Court against the summons issued by Sebi.
Sources said Sebi’s investigation has revealed that the fund diversion from Zee is significantly greater than previously estimated. The regulator is in the process of issuing fresh show cause notices to Chandra and his son Punit Goenka in the matter.
The promoters of Zee have less than a 4 per cent stake in the company, while 96 per cent is publicly owned. The shares of Zee Entertainment declined by more than 3 per cent on Tuesday.
 "India reiterates opposition to China’s Belt and Road Initiative at SCO meet | External Affairs Defence Security News")
 "Trade deficit eases to $20.8 bn in Sept amid geopolitical challenges | Economy & Policy News")
