Home/Technology/NASA wants to know how the launch industry's chic new rocket fuel explodes

NASA wants to know how the launch industry's chic new rocket fuel explodes

TechnologyMarch 20, 20262 min readAttributed summary
NASA wants to know how the launch industry's chic new rocket fuel explodes
"We put fuel in a rocket, blow it up in a remote location, and measure how big the boom is."
Reading Settings

For more than 60 years, nearly every large rocket used some combination of the same liquid and solid propellants. Refined kerosene was favored for its easy handling and non-toxicity, hydrazine for its storability and simplicity, hydrogen for its efficiency, and solid fuels for their long shelf life and rapid launch capability.

About 15 years ago, rocket companies started serious development of large methane-fueled engines. SpaceX and Blue Origin now build the most powerful of these new engines—the Raptor and BE-4—each capable of generating more than half a million pounds of thrust. SpaceX's Starship rocket and its enormous booster are powered by 39 Raptors, while Blue Origin's New Glenn and United Launch Alliance's Vulcan rockets use a smaller number of BE-4s on their booster stages.

Burning methane in combination with liquid oxygen, these "methalox" engines have several advantages. Methane is better suited for reusable engines because they leave less behind sooty residue than kerosene, which SpaceX uses on the Falcon 9 rocket. Methane is easier to handle than liquid hydrogen, which is prone to leaks and must be stored at staggeringly cold temperatures of around minus 423 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 253 degrees Celsius). Methane is also a cryogenic liquid, but it has a warmer temperature closer to that of liquid oxygen, between minus 260 and minus 297 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 162 to minus 183 degrees Celsius).

Read full article

Comments

Source: Ars Technica

Related technology stories

Are 3D printers worth buying in 2026?
Sourced report
engadget.com9 hours ago

Are 3D printers worth buying in 2026?

3D printers have become more advanced and user-friendly than they were ten years ago, but they may not be ready for the masses.

1 min briefingRead signal →
Who’s liable when AI agents go rogue?
Sourced report
technologyreview.com9 hours ago

Who’s liable when AI agents go rogue?

MIT Technology Review Explains: Let our writers untangle the complex, messy world of technology to help you understand what’s coming next. You can read more from the series here. Over the past few mon

12 min briefingRead signal →