Should the controversial fight between Mike Tyson vs Jake Paul go ahead? Join The Independent Debate

Sign up to our free sport newsletter for all the latest news on everything from cycling to boxing

Sign up to our free sport email for all the latest news

Sign up to our free sport email for all the latest news

The boxing world is abuzz as Jake Paul prepares to face off against Mike Tyson on Friday.

Broadcast live on Netflix, the fight, set to take place at the AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas, is already being called one of the most controversial matchups in recent years.

Tyson, who will be 58 by fight night on Friday, remains a legendary figure as the youngest-ever heavyweight champion. Paul, on the other hand, has carved out a divisive yet lucrative career by blending celebrity and combat, challenging retired MMA fighters and ex-champions.

Critics, including promoters like Eddie Hearn and Frank Warren, argue that the fight is a “freak show” and a threat to the dignity of boxing, prioritising spectacle and profit over merit and legacy.

Others, however, see Paul’s foray into the sport as an intriguing blend of entertainment and athleticism, sparking attention that mainstream boxing hasn’t seen in years.

So, what do you think? Is the Paul vs. Tyson bout a disgrace to boxing’s history, or simply the latest evolution of a sport hungry for modern relevance?

Share your thoughts in the comments — we’ll highlight the best responses as they come in.

All you have to do is sign up and register your details — then you can take part in the discussion. You can also sign up by clicking ‘log in’ on the top right-hand corner of the screen.